1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Based on interviews, R1 and R2 receive visitation and are accorded privacy while in care. R1 and R2 usually decline visits from certain visitors, however, R1 and R2 do have privacy with visitors when they come to the facility. Interviews indicate R2 gets very agitated when visitors come to visit. The facility decided to allow the visits to take place in the lobby or dining room because to assist with R2’s agitation. Witnesses interviewed stated on several occasions, certain visitors of R1 and R2 have tried to enter the Memory Care Unit without proper authorization, causing a scene in the front lobby and requiring staff to ask visitors to leave the facility. 7 of 7 staff interviewed stated that to be true. Allegations are UNFOUNDED.
According to staff and witnesses, R1 and R2 are not being denied their mail. R1 and R2 do not use the US Postal Service due to their medical conditions therefore R1 and R2’s mail is forwarded to an authorized representative. Allegation is UNFOUNDED.
This agency has investigated the complaint alleging the facility did not conduct a pre-admission appraisal on residents in care, resident is not being allowed visitations, resident is not provided access to a phone, resident is not being permitted to receive mail, and resident is not being accorded privacy and based on LPA’s observations, documents reviewed and staff, witnesses and residents interviewed, we have found that all allegations are UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegations are false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis.
Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, no citations were issued. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was given to Henry Cole.
|