1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Throughout the course of the investigation, CCL conducted interviews, toured facility, and reviewed documents. Interviews were conducted with Staff, Administrator, Residents and R1’s Responsible Party (RP). When receiving the complaint, CCL was informed resident calls out for help and no one assist, and that their incontinence care needs are not being met. Through interviews conducted, it was stated R1 would be routinely checked on roughly every twenty (20) minutes, as all residents are. It was also stated when R1 would call out for help, staff would assist R1 with their needs if not immediately, then within five (5) minutes. Interviews with resident’s stated the care staff treat them well, going on to state staff provide good care to facility residents.
LPA noted when reviewing document, R1 did have incontinence care needs along with other ADL’s that were to be performed by the facility. Documents provided indicate R1 had Home Health come in as well to assist with physical therapy.
When at facility conducting facility tours, LPA Leitzell noted care staff continuously monitoring residents and assisting residents with their care needs. LPA failed to see any residents go unattended or neglected during facility visits.
Through interviews conducted, documents reviewed, and facility visits performed; CCL finds the allegation of Resident’s Care Needs Not Being Met to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the allegation is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. There are no deficiencies being cited per Title 22 Regulations, Division 6, Chapter 8. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was left at facility for review. |