1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | 2. Staff also stated they answer all call pendants and LPA was unable to interview the resident in question because the resident refused to be interviewed during LPA’s attempts. LPA reviewed the call log and observed that several stated the calls went unanswered on both the assisted living side and memory care side. The residents interviewed on the assisted living side state the calls are answered. LPA was informed the caregivers wear a pendant that clears the call requests from the residents and that the building was down to only a couple for the memory care and assisted living side for awhile and management was not made aware of the issue until August 2022. LPA was told that sometimes the caregivers don’t turn off the call pendant because they focus on the resident first when responding to the call pendant and forget to turn off the call pendant. More pendants for the caregivers have been ordered and are ordered on a regular basis. Other interviews stated the staff ignore the call button for a particular resident which staff deny, and LPA was unable to interview that resident. Because each side has their own version of events LPA cannot prove or disprove.
3. Interviews with staff stated they have not witnessed any issues between staff and residents. Interviews with most of the residents indicate no issues between staff and residents. One interview stated there was an issue with one caregiver. LPA was unable to interview the resident in question because the resident refused to be interviewed. Because each side has their own version of events LPA cannot prove or disprove.
Based on interviews with staff and residents, as well as a review of facility call logs, LPA cannot prove or disprove any of the allegations above. The allegations are unsubstantiated. |