1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | 9099A-C(2).. Allegation: Staff overcharged resident while in care. Complaint alleges that following the first elopement, resident's (R1) responsible person was informed that R1, would require a full-time, 24/7 caregiver to watch over her, but the facility did not inform him that he would be responsible for paying the sitter. On/around 12/16/22, resident/resident's responsible person was issued a bill for for the private sitter from 8/31/22 to 12/16/22.
Resident’s representative stated he was not told by the facility that he or resident would have to pay for the 1:1 supervision and and assumed it was included in the basic rent charge resident was paying. Responsible person asserted that he told the facility Administrator, he "refused to pay for 1:1 after the first AWOL" at the end of August 2022. Responsible person stated he didn't know how much the 1:1 supervision cost until December, on 12/16/22, when he received a bill, at which time he gave R1's 30-day notice.. RP stated he was not aware he was being charged for 1:1 until December when he received a bill.
Interviews with multiple staff managers, including the Administrator, Business Office Director, Assisted Living Coordinator and Memory Care Coordinator, confirmed that R1's responsible person was told that he would need to pay for resident's 1:1 care needed to prevent her from eloping from the facility again. Narrative charting notes, on 8/28/22 and 8/31/22, document conversations and phone calls attempts with responsible person to discuss responsible person obtaining a 1:1 care giver, 24/7 for resident. Specifically, notes entered on 8/31/22 by Assisted Living Coordinator, Elaina, that the facility is "waiting on 1:1 being set up by RP (responsible person)". Ombudsman stated in an email to LPA that responsible person was told he would have to pay for the 1:1 supervision.
Administrator stated there were initial discussions with R1's responsible person about the cost of a 1:1 caregiver, 24/7, but when follow up attempts were made by phone to discuss the discussion, the phone call would "always drop" with resident's responsible person stating he "didn't know what happened'". Administrator stated resident's responsible person has a "solid ballpark idea" of the cost a 1:1 caregiver, 24/7, would cost him. The Administrator stated the facility "stepped in because the responsible person was not following through" in obtaining a caregiver. Administrator stated a 1:1 caregiver was found through a new agency they had recently started working with for registry staff. Both the Administrator and Business Office Director confirmed that when a new vendor is used, there are billing delays in the system. Billing statements provided by the facility, dated 8/31/22, 9/30/22, 10/31/22 and 11/30/22, only show each monthly charge for basic services, medication and additional charges based on the resident’s service level. The 1:1 companion care, billed starting on 8/31/22 through 11/5/22, was not charged until the statement dated 12/31/22. The following monthly statement, dated 1/31/23, list charges for companion care for the period 11/6/22-12/31/22. cont on 9099A-C(3)... |