1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Records review for R1 found R1 to be diagnosed by R1’s primary physician as having Alzheimer's and bi-polar disorder.
On 5/7/24, LPA interviewed R1. R1 stated that R1 is not being held against his will at the facility and that for the time being R1 does not wish to have calls or visits while R1 is focused on getting better. R1 stated to LPA that he does not know why R1 made those previous statements.
On 5/7/24, LPA interviewed the Administrator. Administrator stated that R1 knew that R1 could make phone calls from the facility phone. After R1 took the phone of another resident to call R1’s family on 4/14/24, Administrator asked R1 why R1 did not ask for the facility phone. R1 reportedly stated that R1 did not know why R1 did that.
Between 5/7/24 and the conclusion of this investigation, attempts by family to call or write to R1 were told to R1 and mail was delivered to R1 and R1 chose to not respond to family contact.
The investigation found that while R1 at times made conflicting statements regarding his wishes or the wishes of others, conclusive evidence was not presented that the facility restricted R1’s right to visits, calls or personal mail.
R1 has since moved out of the facility.
As a result of this investigation, LPA finds allegation to be (US)Unsubstantiated - A finding that the complaint is Unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.
Exit interview with designee, Mario Lantao and report provided. |