1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | January 2026, the facility did not administer Levothyroxine on the following dates in January: 9, 10, 13, 14, and 16. R2’s January 2026 MAR states that the Diltiazem was not in a bubble pack nor was there a bottle in stock at the facility yet documentation showed an active order and should have been administered routinely. Based on documentation, the facility did not administer prescribed medications to R1 and R2 as directed by physician.
Not following admission agreement:
Facility not providing proper notice for care increase
According to the signed admission agreement for R1 provided by the licensee, it states ‘Modification of agreement: any changes or modifications to this admission agreement (including changes in service, fees, or policies) must be made in writing and signed by both the resident/representative and the facility”.
During the course of the investigation, Documentation reviewed showed Revival uses a tier system for charging care costs for each resident. On 12/12/2025, Revival increased tier costs without providing 90-day notice to each resident as required by statute. According to documentation that was provided, the tier pricing increased in December 2025, however the licensee did not provide the Department with any notices which were given (and signed) to residents/authorized representatives. The Department obtained an email which was sent to R1’s payee notifying that R1 and R2’s tier cost increase would be effective on 01/01/2026, The email was sent on 12/12/2025 providing a 20-day notice of increase.
Facility not providing proper notice for rent increase
R1 and R2 moved into the facility in September 2025. The licensee billed R1 and R2 for a prorated amount for rent and care at time of move in. Based on the admission agreement, the monthly rate for R1 was $6300 and $1,200 for R2 totaling $7500 for both R1 and R2. In November 2025, the licensee billed R1 and R2 $8,000. The $500 increase in rent was not provided to R1, R2 or their responsible party as required by statute. Furthermore, January invoices dated 12/30/25 show R1 was billed for $5,750 and R2 was billed $6,300 for rent. The licensee did not follow the agreed upon admission agreement and increased monthly charges without required notification time frame.
|