1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | this time.
Pertaining to the allegation, "Facility charged resident for services not rendered," it was alleged the facility received and cashed a check issued by a third party agency responsible for R1's placement. The check allegedly issued in February 2018 was in the amount of $1,423.69. The LPA initiated the investigation into the allegation on June 28, 2019; records were reviewed and copies obtained. According to a Resident Information sheet, services for R1 were discontinued on 07/17/2017. The Administrator stated she did not know if a check was issued to the facility by the agency and cashed on behalf of R1. The Administrator stated the third party agency did not pay rent for R1 for approximately two (2) months. Tolentino did not have dates for which the agency did not make payments for services provided. The Administrator stated the amount owed to the facility is approximately $2,000. R1 could not be reached for an interview. This allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time.
With regard to the allegation, "Facility failed to issue a refund," it was alleged the facility failed to issue a refund to a third party agency responsible for R1's placement. The refunds included the remainder of one payment ($410.52) from June 2017, in which R1 was reportedly evicted, and of a second payment ($1,423.69) mistakenly issued by the third party agency after the resident was no longer in the facility. The LPA initiated the investigation into the allegation on June 28, 2019; records were reviewed and copies obtained. Per the Administrator, R1 returned to the facility following their hospital discharge in June 2017. Of the three (3) staff interviewed, two (2) denied having any knowledge on whether R1 was or was not evicted from the facility while one (1) reported R1 was not evicted. In addition, the Administrator could not recall if the facility received the February 2018 payment of $1,423.69. The Administrator reported the third party agency did owe the facility approximately $2,000 for services provided to R1 over the course of approximately two (2) months. The Administrator did not have dates of payments not made by the agency nor an exact dollar amount owed. Furthermore, R1 could not be reached for an interview. This allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. A finding that the complaint is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation(s) occurred.
An exit interview was conducted with Tolentino, where this report was reviewed and a copy provided. |