1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | S1 added Staff 2 (S2) intervened and directed R1 to not hit S1, to which R1 complied without further incident. During a different occasion, S1 heard Administrator Almazan verbally disagreeing with R1 but S1 never observed Administrator Almazan hit R1 or any other resident in the facility. S2 was interviewed and corroborated witnessing R1 attempt to hit S1 and intervening to stop the incident. Both staff reported they have never physically assaulted R1 or any other resident in the facility and listed R1 as the verbal aggressor. S2 added they have never observed or have knowledge Administrator Almazan physically assaulted any of the residents in the home.
Regarding the allegation, “Multiple residents sustaining wounds while in care due to staff neglect” it was alleged several residents have wounds being cared for by outside agencies only and not facility staff. No additional details were provided in the allegation. Since the facility has not provided a copy of resident records, LPA was unable to review records to determine which residents received wound care from outside agencies. As a result, LPA was also unable to obtain the alleged victims’ contact information for an interview. Two (2) staff were interviewed and reported the following information. Resident records were locked in the administrator’s office and inaccessible to care staff. Hospice records and information was not available for staff to review, and staff was only aware a resident was on hospice or home health if management informed them, or if they observed the resident receive hospice/home health services at the facility. Some residents had wounds that were being treated by hospice. Caregivers received wound care training from hospice and provided as needed wound care to the residents who required it.
Regarding the allegation, “Staff do not screen visitors” it was alleged several people go in the facility without being screened or signing in. Only one (1) of two (2) staff interviewed corroborated the allegation. One (1) of two (2) staff interviewed reported that prior to the facility’s closure, staff began screening visitors and asking them to sign a visitor’s log. One (1) of two (2) staff interviewed was unable to provide an estimated date or year the facility began screening visitors. Due to the facility’s not providing pertinent records, LPA was unable to review the visitor’s log to confirm this information.
Regarding the allegation, “Staff do not ensure that residents are adequately hydrated” it was alleged residents are only served water. Two (2) staff interviewed reported the facility always had water available for the residents to drink and occasionally provided them juice, iced tea, milk, or sodas with meals. The facility has yet to provide written information as proof of water/drink options purchased for the residents to refute the allegations.
|