1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegations: Resident sustained injuries due to a fall. It is alleged around December 2022, R2 sustained an unwitnessed fall which left R2 with bruises and lacerations. Interviews conducted with residents revealed 4 out of 8 residents were unable to answer due to cognitive skills. 2 out of 8 residents stated to have fallen and staff provided assistance right away and 2 out of 8 residents stated to not fallen while in care but are certain staff will assist them right away if it happens. Interviews with staff revealed facility has a protocol for residents falls. Per staff if a resident falls Med-Techs are called. Med-techs evaluate the resident and if the resident is laying on their back or hit their head they are send out to the hospital for further evaluation. Staff stated that they have staff checking on residents and are aware of residents that need assistance. Those residents that need additional assistance are maintain within supervision range. Documents review revealed the following, per physician’s report dated: 2/15/22, R2 is non-ambulatory and there were no notes of risk fall. Per needs and care plan dated 6/20/22 R2 requires a 1 person assist escort and total assistance with transferring. Medical records reviewed revealed R2 was seen on 10/13/22 due to a hematoma. On 11/7/22 R2 was seen at the hospital due to a mechanical fall. On 12/13/22 R2 was seen by a physician due to a fall. Hospice records show that R2 was being provided hospice services since 3/12/21, plan of care notes dated 3/12/21, note R2 must have precaution care for falls/injures. Hospice notes between September and December 2022 do not note concerns or falls. Medical record dated 10/13/22 notes R2 was seen for a hematoma. However, it does not note whether the reason was a fall. There were no incident reports to review for the falls above. Although R2 did sustained 2 falls were medical records it is unclear whether the falls were due to lack of supervision. Therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Regarding allegation: Staff leave residents unattended in dirty diapers for extended periods of time. It is alleged residents are left unchanged for an extended period of time. Interviews conducted with residents revealed 3 out of 8 residents do not need assistance with incontinence care and stated staff assist with care as needed. 3 out of 8 residents were unable to answer due to cognitive skills and 2 out of 8 residents stated facility staff assist residents with going to the bathroom and changing as needed. Interviews with staff revealed 4 out of 7 staff stated caregivers who assist residents with incontinence care check residents every two to three hours and check residents as needed. 2 out of 7 staff were not aware of concerns with incontinence care. (CONTINUED ON LIC 9099C) |