1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Continued from LIC9099.
Administrator, Rebecca Carrasco, reported the residents kept breaking the call system and the facility stopped replacing it about a year ago. R1’s physician report dated 04/09/2019 indicates R1 was slightly confused due to pre dementia / Alzheimer’s, had wandering behavior and could not speak due to prior stroke regarding their ability to communicate their needs. In addition, at the time of the incident, there was at least one resident who required night supervision per the pre-placement appraisal dated 06/01/2020.
Regarding the allegation “Staff failed to prevent resident from wandering while in care”, LPA interviewed staff and Licensee who stated R1 wandered off the facility two to three times. The Licensee reported she could not recall the exact dates. The Licensee stated facility had an operable door alarm, but it didn't stop resident from walking off the facility. Licensee stated staff sometimes do not hear the alarm because they are busy helping other residents or if staff is sleeping. Staff interviews corroborated Licensee’s statements that R1 wandered from the facility on more than one occasion. Staff interviews revealed R1 would wander off when staff were sleeping and would use a chair to get over the fence. Staff interviews did not reveal dates. Licensee stated facility didn’t have a plan in place to mitigate resident from wandering out of the facility without staff supervision.
Regarding the allegation “Staff failed to properly report incidents regarding resident”, the licensee stated R1 had wandered off the facility two to three times. Licensee acknowledged the incidents were not reported to Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) as required. Licensee stated staff on duty was supposed to do all the paperwork and reporting to CCLD. Staff interviews revealed verbal reports were given to the licensee and the licensee was supposed to report to CCLD.
Based on interviews and record reviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore, the above allegations are found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division & Chapter number 6 are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D). An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was reviewed and provided along with appeal rights to Rebecca Carrasco. An immediate civil penalty of $500 is being assessed for R1 sustaining burns. In accordance with H&S Code Section 1569.49(e), the determination of additional civil penalties for a violation that resulted in a serious injury to the resident, is pending and under review by the Department.
|