1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | In regards to allegation #2, LPA Williams interviewed S1, S2, and S3. who all stated that R2, as well as all other residents, are provided with three meals and snacks a day.S1 and S2 both stated that R2 eats their meals and the facility has had no concerns with R2 eating meals. S3 stated that R2 does eat their meals; however, R2 will sometimes refuse to eat. LPA Williams interviewed R1 and R2 who both denied that facility staff are not ensuring the residents are fed. R1 and R2 both stated that they enjoy eating the facility's meals. At the time of visit, LPA Williams observed that lunch was being served to all residents in the facility's dining room.
In regards to allegation #3, LPA Williams interviewed S1 and S2 who stated that all residents are groomed and changed on a daily basis. S2 stated that there are some occasions where R2 is combative and refuses to change clothes, so they are only able to put on R2's shirt and depends. S2 stated that staff are able to put R2 in proper clothing when behaviors digress. LPA Williams interviewed R1 and R2 who denied that staff are not providing proper clothing to the residents. At the time of visit, LPA Williams observed that all residents are dressed appropriately and appeared to be well-groomed.
Based on evidence obtained during today’s visit, LPA has determined that the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED; meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur.
An exit interview was conducted where this report (LIC 9099) was discussed and a copy was provided to Oden at the conclusion of the investigation.
|