1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | S1 stated that there were concerns regarding mistreatment of the residents by Staff #4 (S4) and Staff #5 (S5), who were contracted through a temp agency, and an internal investigation was conducted. S1 stated that the allegation could not be proved; however, those staff members are no longer working at the facility. S2 stated that they “heard” from other staff members that S4 may have been physically aggressive with some residents but denied witnessing such incidence. S1 and S2 also both denied observing any injuries/bruises on resident’s indicative of physical abuse. LPA Williams attempted to contact S4 and S5 on several occasions but was unsuccessful.
In regards to allegation #2, LPA Williams did not discover any evidence which would prove that facility staff did in fact, verbally abused the residents. LPA Williams interviewed S1, S2, and S3, who all denied having knowledge or witnessing staff members being verbally abusive towards residents. LPA Williams attempted to contact S4 and S5 on several occasions but was unsuccessful.
In regards to allegation #3, LPA Williams did not discover any evidence which would prove that facility staff did not, in fact, meet the incontinence care needs of the residents. LPA Williams interviewed S1 and S2, who stated that facility protocol is to change/check residents for incontinence every two hours or as needed for those who require higher care. S1 and S2 denied that facility staff is not meeting incontinence care needs of the residents. S1 and S2 stated that facility staff is following facility protocol regarding incontinence care. LPA Williams also interviewed S3 who denied facility staff is not meeting the incontinence care needs of the residents. S3 stated that from what they have observed, facility staff are constantly changing residents’ diapers.
In regards to allegation #3, LPA Williams did not discover any evidence which would prove that facility staff did not, in fact, retrieve timely medical care for resident. LPA Williams interviewed S1 and S2 who stated that R1's medical provider was made aware of R1's change in condition and subsequently contacted emergency services. LPA Williams reviewed R1's medical records which indicated that R1 was taken to the hospital to address change of condition observed by facility staff. LPA Williams interviewed S1 and S2 regarding the injuries R2 had sustained from an altercation with another resident. S1 and S2 both stated that R2 was assessed and facility staff determined that they would call emergency services for R2. S2 stated that there was a delay in sending R2 via ambulance as the fire department who responded stated that there is no ambulance readily available. S2 did state that R2 was being treated and assessed by the fire department/paramedic until an ambulance was available to transport R2. LPA Williams reviewed R2's medical |