1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Moreover, LPA Javier Prieto interviewed Resident #1 (R1) on 09/20/2023 and R1 reported eating with R2 and indicated consensual relationship with Resident #2 (R2). Interviews with nine (9) of ten (10) staff on 11/08/2023 indicated that staffs at the facility redirected R1 and R2 when a staff found them engaging in sexual interactions. Staff #6 (S6) reported to LPA Brown that they redirected R1 and R2 when they witnessed R2 pulling up R2's pants and R1 was fixing R1's pants when they enter R2's room. S6 added that R2 ran to the door, trying to block them and R1 was upset told them to "Mind your own business. Get out of here. But what we did is we redirected R1 out of R2's room and put R1 on high alert, 24/7, which means R1 must be on constant eye watch, all the time and R2 was put on thirty (30) minutes check. " Per documents review, LPA Brown observed that staffs at the facility are checking on their residents every two (2) hours and more often if needed.
Moreover, LPA Brown contacted R1's family/Power of Attorney (POA) and they reported that the facility informed them of the incident the same day it happened and indicated that staff immediately redirected R1 and R2 when they found them engaging in a sexual intercourse in R2's room.
Based on the evidence, the allegation that Staff did not prevent a resident from engaging in sexual interactions with another resident while in care is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated at this time.
An exit interview was conducted where this report, LIC9099 was discussed and provided to Executive Director Griselda Garcia. |