1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | R1 was not a fall risk and did not have to have continuous monitoring. R1 resided in the assisted living portion of the facility. R1 was not on hospice or home health care. R1 was re-evaluated by physician on March 6, 2020, after R1’s prior fall, and R1 was determined to be ambulatory with no other concerns. Therefore, due to lack of evidence to suggest that facility staff did not provide the level of care & supervision required by R1, the allegation “Lack of care and supervision contributed to resident's death” is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Regarding allegation "Failure to properly safeguard resident's property upon death": LPA Colvin reviewed facility records for R1, including the inventory and valuables list completed by residents when they move into the facility, as well as interviews conducted by Department with facility staff. LPA Colvin observed that upon R1’s move into the facility in 2014, R1 had minimal property listed on the form other than a couple of clothing items, shoes, hat, watch, and glasses. The resident’s inventory list was not updated throughout the six years that R1 resided at the facility, and according to interviews with staff, R1 did not receive any supplies or additional funds from family towards the end of R1’s stay at the facility, however, staff members state that they would purchase or provide R1 with additional clothing when needed. Additionally, since no one claimed R1’s remains at the hospital upon passing; R1’s remains were held in storage for six months until they were eventually released to Riverside County Public Administrator. Therefore, due to lack of documentation of R1’s belongings and the amount of time that has passed since R1 passed away, there is not enough evidence to support the allegation, “Failure to properly safeguard resident's property upon death”, which is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
A finding of UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur.
An exit interview was not able to be conducted however, a copy of this report along with LIC 811- Confidential Names List was sent via email to designee at m.hellickson@icloud.com. |