1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | It was alleged that R1’s medication had not been refilled for three weeks. Through interviews with staff, LPA discovered that the doctor’s office wanted R1’s blood drawn due to the type of medication that R1 had been on. Staff advised that the doctor’s office would not refill the medication until the blood draw was done. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, they were having difficulty getting the blood draw completed. Licensee provided a lab and made available that would be present inside the facility that could conduct the draw; however, R1’s doctor’s office refused. Staff were continuing to work on alternatives with the doctor’s office. Interviews with residents revealed that medications were being ordered and delivered, and there was not a general complaint of residents not getting their medications. Due to lack of evidence, and conflicting accounts, this allegation was Unsubstantiated; therefore, the Department was unable to dismiss the allegation.
It was then alleged that R1 was supposed to be on a no salt diet, but the facility does not abide by it. R1 allegedly gets the same food as everyone else. Interviews with staff revealed that the facility provides a low salt and no salt diet. Interviews with residents revealed that the facility provides a variety of options including low salt/no salt diets. Additionally, residents reported that even if an item is not on the menu, the facility will provide the item. The menu is really for guidance, and there are many options available for residents to choose from. Thus, this allegation was Unsubstantiated.
A finding of UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur.
An exit interview was conducted where a copy of this report was discussed with and provided.
|