| Allegation: Licensee not adhering to client needs
The detail of the complaint alleges that C1’s doctor recommended that C1 be referred to a specialist for dental care and care provider has not followed up.
On March 19, 2026, at 2:30pm, the Department interviewed Administrator (A1), who denied the allegation and stated that "we tend to all the client's needs, and follow any and all recommendations from the doctor."
On March 19, 2026, between 2:18 pm and 4pm the Department interviewed 2 staff (S1-S 2) regarding the allegation and of those interviewed 2 out of 2 staff denied the allegation stating that they meet the needs of the clients in care and follow all orders and recommendations.
On March 18 and 19 2026 the Department made call attempts to speak with the Placement Agency’s Quality Assurance Specialist (W1). However, calls were not returned by time of visit.
Not all records from 2023 were available for the Department to review.
On March 19,2026, the Department observed that the clients were well groomed and had good hygiene. 2 out of 3 clients stated that they are treated well. 1 out 3 is non-verbal.
Based on the information gathered, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation mentioned above; Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
There were no deficiencies cited during today's visit. Exit interview conducted and copy of report provided.
Page 3 of 3
|