1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | On 6/28/2023, S2 administered R1’s medication incorrectly. R1’s medication was supposed to be lowered to half of the normal dosage, but instead S2 increased R1’s dosage three (3) times the prescribed amount. Thirty-six (36) hours later R1 suffered a stroke and was transported to receive medical care. Based upon investigation, medication documentation did not substantiate that R1 stroke was due to the inaccurate medication dosage.
The allegation listed above is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED.
A finding that the complaint is UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur.
During today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations.
An exit interview was conducted, and this report was discussed and provided to Administrator Lisa Hunt.
|