1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding allegation "Staff stole a resident's personal belongings": LPA Colvin conducted interviews with staff, resident (R1), and others with knowledge of R1's possessions at the facility. LPA Colvin additionally reviewed R1's file regarding property listed in R1's possession at the facility. LPA Colvin learned through interview with one of R1's Power of Attorney's (POA) that one of the items of concern (tablet) was removed from R1's possession by order of the POA, and the facility has the tablet stored in the med room and available to R1 on request. LPA Colvin inquired about R1's reportedly missing "Alexa" device, but staff did not have knowledge of the device to be missing, though it is noted in R1's property log. While R1's device may have been misplaced by R1 or taken by another (possibly a resident), there is not enough evidence to confirm that R1's "Alexa" was taken specifically by a staff member. Additional items of concern (photos, perfume, makeup) were not listed on R1's property log and staff denied any knowledge of missing items. Therefore, based on record review, interviews, and lack of evidence, the allegation " Staff stole a resident's personal belongings" is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Regarding allegation "Staff inappropriately searched a resident while in care": LPA Colvin conducted interviews with staff, resident (R1), and others with knowledge of R1's care and history. LPA Colvin attempted to interview the suspected staff (S1) to have inappropriately searched R1, but S1 works the overnight shift at the facility, and did not respond to LPA Colvin's telephone call. Other interviews conducted did not reveal any supporting evidence to the allegation, and staff interviewed denied there being specific objects that R1 is not allowed to have, other than the standard sharp items, and that staff do not search residents. Therefore, due to lack of evidence and conflicting statements, the allegation "Staff inappropriately searched a resident while in care" is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Regarding allegation "Resident is being mistreated while in care": LPA Colvin interviewed staff, resident (R1), and others with knowledge of R1's care. The majority of interviews conducted with persons who had knowledge regarding the circumstances surrounding the allegation, provided LPA Colvin with a consistent story of events. The allegation is in regards to R1 being "isolated" in another building other than where R1's room is located. Interviews revealed that at some point after R1 was admitted to the facility in May 2022, R1 observed someone type in the security code for the doors to the building where R1 lives, and memorized the code. Staff was made aware of the security breach, and until the code could be reset, R1 was moved during R1's waking hours to the building next door for "Day Programming". LPA Colvin inquired as to what "Day Programming" consisted of, and was informed that it was simply moving R1 to the other building (which had a larger number of staff) during the waking hours for supervision purposes of R1. |