1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Investigation revealed that from May 5, 2020, through May 7, 2020, hospice agency staff attempted to contact facility staff for a tele-health visit. However, hospice agency staff were unsuccessful in making contact via telephone. Specifically, it was found that that on May 5, 2020, a Hospice LVN attempted numerous calls to facility staff for a tele-health visit and all calls were unsuccessful. After the hospice staff were not able to get in touch with anyone from the facility after several calls, an in-person hospice visit was conducted on May 7, 2020. At the time of this visit, R1 was observed to have a stage II pressure injury to the coccyx. Hospice Plan of Care (POC) dated May 7, 2020, instructed facility to “assess alteration in skin integrity every visit; assess changes in wound status for size, integrity, location, type/stage, signs and symptoms of infection, drainage, and effectiveness of current treatment.”. May 8, 2020 through May 13, 2020 the hospice agency did not hear from the facility regarding R1. On May 13, 2020, R1s hospice agency received a call from facility LVN (S3) informing them that R1’s wound “looked bad.” Hospice staff went to the facility on May 13, 2020. According to hospice records, the pressure injury to the coccyx was now identified as unstageable. POC was put in place by hospice agency. Facility staff were also provided with instructions regarding treatment for R1 pressure injury. It was revealed that (S2) was at least one of the staff who had knowledge of the care to be provided to R1. However, investigation further revealed that facility records do not support that staff provided the care to R1 as required. Specifically, facility staff were instructed to reposition R1 every two-three hours and to change dressing every three days or as necessary.
When interviewed, former administrator (S1) admitted to knowing about the pressure injury. However, investigation found that (S1), along with facility staff, failed to ensure that R1 was free from neglect which resulted in R1 sustaining an unstageable pressure injury. As a result, the department has substantiated the complaint allegation as valid and that a violation has occurred based on the preponderance of available evidence. A copy of this report along with appeal rights are being reviewed with and furnished to the facility representative. Please see LIC 9099D. The licensee has been informed that an enhanced civil penalty may be assessed based on Health and Safety Code 1569.49 after further review by the department. |