1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13 | Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Stephanie Martinez, conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to start the investigation into the above allegation. The LPA met with Kurt Niebres, Administrator, and informed him of the purpose for the visit. A report was received alleging Staff One (S1) refused to allow Resident One (R1) to return to the facility following a temporary admission to a skilled nursing facility. The investigation included staff/resident interviews, records review, and records collection. S1 was interviewed and denied the allegation. S1 stated they notified the skilled nursing facility that R1 could only return to the facility under the supervision of a hospice agency for their Restricted Health Condition (RHC). A third party reported S1 did indicate they could not accept R1 back at the facility until the resident was on services with a hospice agency. In addition, Progress Notes from May 30, 2023, revealed S1 had already been notified of the healing of R1's RHC and of the resident being ready for discharge. Therefore, based on interviews and records, this allegation is deemed SUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is substantiated means the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. An exit interview was conducted with Niebres; this report was reviewed, and a copy was provided, along with instructions on appeal rights. |