1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | During interviews with staff, LPA was informed that on September 29, 2022, S7 was in the kitchen while S5 was in the living room with C1, C3, C4. From the kitchen, S7 heard a loud hit. S7 walked into the living room and saw S5 hit C1 on their butt. S7 stated that C1 was visibly shaken and emotionally upset. After the altercation, C1 was flinching at the sight of S5. The other staff stated that they were not working the day of the altercation but believed that S5 was capable of hitting C1 based on prior behaviors of being intimating, yelling, and being aggressive towards the clients. The staff that were not present were informed by C3 and C4 that they saw S5 hit C1. The staff stated that the clients are afraid of S5. Staff states that soon as S5 walks into a room, the demeanor of the clients changes and its visible that the clients are uncomfortable. S5 denied there was an alternation with hitting C1 during a diaper change. S5 stated there was a diaper change in the living room and only C5 and C1 were present.
For allegation, Staff did not treat resident with dignity or respect: It was alleged that the clients are yelled at by S5, scared of S5, and treated unfairly by S5.
During interviews with clients, C3 and C4 saw S5 hit C1 and yell at C1 during a diaper change. The clients stated they have had experiences where S5 yelled at them, treated them unfairly, and has seen S5 treat the other clients unfairly.
During interviews with staff, the staff stated that the clients are intimated by S5 and their whole demeanor changes when S5 is present. Staff stated that S5 yells and intimates the clients. The staff stated that the clients are afraid of S5. Interview with S5 revealed that S5 denied treating the clients unfairly, yelling at the clients, or intimating the clients.
Based on the evidence gathered during the investigation, the two (2) allegations listed above are deemed SUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaints are SUBSTANTIATED means that the allegations are valid because the preponderance of evidence the standard has been met.
During today’s visit, two (2) deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations.
An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC9099) and LIC9099D was discussed and provided to House Manager Maureen Sevilla, along with a copy of the appeal rights. |