1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | For allegation, Staff not maintaining residents grooming needs:
Interviews with residents and interviews with the staff revealed that there was no evidence of staff neglecting the resident’s grooming needs. The residents denied that the staff is neglecting their grooming needs. The staff denied neglecting the resident’s grooming needs. LPA was not able to speak to R1 due to R1 passing away in November of 2020.
Overall, there was not enough evidence to collaborate the allegations listed above.
Based on evidence obtained during the investigation, the two (2) allegations listed above are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaints are UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur.
During today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations.
An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC9099) was discussed and provided to Licensee/Administrator Marilou Panaligan, along with a copy of the appeal rights. |