1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | It was corroborated through both S1 and C1’s interviews, that there were no other individuals in S1’s personal vehicle when C1 was being transported on the date in question.
Interview with client, revealed C1 had sexual intercourse with S1 in S1’s personal vehicle in the parking lot of the offsite work location before C1 reported to work. S1 denied they had sexual intercourse with C1 and reported C1 was driven directly to the offsite work location, they parked, and S1 walked C1 into the work location to ensure C1 connected with proper supervision.
Efforts were made by the Department to obtain video footage of the parking lot outside of C1’s workplace. However, there was no video footage available. Local law enforcement also conducted an investigation. A review of the police reports dated 06/22/2022 and 08/02/2022, was conducted, which revealed a crime had not been committed because C1 had consented to the encounter, and it was determined C1 had ability to consent. The police reports revealed S1 had not been interviewed.
A review of C1’s records was conducted which revealed C1 has a history of making false allegations and engaging in inappropriate behaviors with peers. S1’s file and criminal record were also reviewed for similar incidents or concerns; however, none were found.
Based on record reviews and interviews, the above allegation is unsubstantiated at this time. Findings that are unsubstantiated mean that although the allegation may be valid, the preponderance of the evidence standard has not been met.
An exit interview was conducted with Administrator, Ana Gutierrez where this report was reviewed and provided to them. |