1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | For allegation, Staff called resident an inappropriate name:
Interviews with the clients and interviews with the staff revealed that the clients and the staff both denied that S1 called C1 an inappropriate name. The staff denied calling any of the client’s inappropriate names. Interviews with the clients revealed that the staff do not call them inappropriate names.
For allegation, Staff threatened resident:
Interviews with the clients and interviews with the staff revealed that the clients and the staff both denied that S1 threatened C1. The staff denied threatening any of the clients. Interviews with the clients revealed that the staff have not threatened the clients.
For allegation, Facility toilet is unsanitary:
Interviews with the clients and interviews with the staff revealed that Client C3 had bowel movement accident and left some fecal matter on the toilet seat. After C3 was done using the bathroom, S1 noticed the fecal matter on the toilet seat. S1 requested the clients to exit the bathroom for a couple minutes so the toilet seat could be cleaned. S1 cleaned the toilet seat once the clients exited the bathroom. Interviews with staff revealed that the bathroom and toilet are cleaned and sanitized once a shift, as well as needed if there are accidents during the day. LPA toured the bathroom on 9/8/2023 and found that the toilet and toilet seat appeared clean with no fecal matter present.
For allegation, Staff encouraged resident to use an unsanitary toilet.
Interviews with the clients and interviews with the staff revealed that the clients and staff both denied that S1 encouraged C1 to use an unsanitary toilet. S1 requested C1 to exit the bathroom for a few minutes so a dirty toilet seat could be cleaned. C1 made their own personal choice to stay in the bathroom with the dirty toilet seat. It is unknown if C1 sat on and or used the dirty toilet seat. The toilet seat was cleaned and sanitized once C1 exited the bathroom. The staff denied that they encouraged any clients to use an unsanitary toilet.
Overall, there was not enough evidence to collaborate the allegations listed above. Based on evidence obtained during the investigation, the five (5) allegations listed above are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. |