1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA conducted interviews with (2) outside sources. (1) interview revealed C1 was observed with injuries the morning of 8/29/2024, when C1 was placed on transportation to their day program. Interview revealed C1 had not been observed engaging in any behaviors or incidents between the time C1 was transported from their home to the day program on 8/29/2024. (1) interview revealed C1 engages in self injurious behaviors and has a 1:1 when they are at their home but not at their day program or on transportation. Interview revealed the injuries observed in the photographs were consistent with self injurious behaviors C1 engages in.
LPA conducted (2) client interviews. (1) client was unable to provide information on the allegation, and (1) client had no knowledge of C1 being injured. LPA conducted (2) facility staff interviews. (Staff revealed that C1 has self injurious behaviors where they hit their head, elbows and scratch their face and body. Staff revealed on 8/29/2024, C1’s had a 1:1 staff who observed and monitored C1 while engaging in self injurious behaviors. Staff provided LPA with (2) videos of C1 when they engage in self injurious behaviors. The videos were consistent with LPA observations during on site visit 9/5/2024. LPA witnessed C1 attempting to hit their face and cheek bones resulting in redness in the clients cheeks during the visit.
LPA reviewed C1’s Individualized Program Plan (IPP) and confirmed C1 has a 1:1 for behavior supports at their residential facility, and self- injurious behaviors such as head banging, and elbowing. LPA reviewed behavior tracking log for C1, where it is documented “self injurious behavior” is defined when C1 strikes their head or facial area against surfaces, strikes themselves, pinches or bites themselves. On 8/29/2024, behavior tracking log and “ABC” sheet documented C1 had (2) instances of self injurious behavior in the morning.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided.
|