1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding the allegation “Staff neglected resident while in care”, it was reported staff was neglecting R1 and did not meet R1’s needs. Record review of R1’s “Resident Assessment” dated 06/10/2021 reveals R1 was scored on a Level 1 care and was independent, ambulatory, required no assistance with activities of daily living (ADL), and had the capabilities to administer their own medication. Interview with eight (8) out of nine (9) residents deny staff neglecting residents in care and would assist residents when necessary. Interview with six (6) out of (six) staff reported they would assist residents when requested and never witnessed staff neglecting residents in care.
Regarding the allegation “Staff failed to respond to residents' call assistance buttons in a timely manner” it was reported staff do not respond to residents’ call button request. Interview with nine (9) out of (9) residents revealed staff respond to residents’ call button request in an adequate amount of time. Interview with five (5) out of six (6) staff revealed staff respond to residents’ call button request as soon as they can and staff response time varies but staff will respond to call button request and assist residents. Investigation did not reveal documents to corroborate nor refute call time responses due to call logs not being available for review.
Regarding the allegation “Staff failed to meet resident's needs”, it was reported when R1 returned from the hospital staff were not able to R1’s needs. R1 returned to the facility on 02/21/2022 and had Resident Assessment set at Level 4 care. Level 4 care for R1 reflected direct supervision of R1 and one to two person total assistance with bathing, dressing , grooming, toileting, and ambulation. R1’s Physician’s Report dated 02/22/2022 revealed R1 needed assistance with ADLs, was non-ambulatory, and was not able to administer own medication. Interview with three (3) staff who worked at the facility in 2022 denied not being able to meet the residents needs and corroborated that Level 4 care included direct supervision of the resident and two hour safety checks. Interview with eight (8) residents deny staff failing to meet their needs.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to Executive Director Stewart. |