1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Interviews with staff revealed residents have access to their personal belongings. In the memory care unit, residents have access to their clothes, briefs, toothbrush, comb/brush, etc. However, items that may cause harm, such as lotions, mouthwash, shampoo/conditioner, are locked in their personal cabinet and accessible when assisting with grooming. LPA toured 6 resident rooms in assisted living and 4 resident rooms in memory care and observed residents had their rooms decorated to their taste and personal belongings were accessible in their closets, dressers, and other furniture. In memory care LPA observed residents’ clothes and other personal belongings accessible. Lock cabinets were opened by staff and grooming items were observed in them. LPA was unable to interview resident #1as the resident no longer resides in the facility. Facility since has had a change in management and documents are currently stored at corporate level.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Regarding allegation: Staff are trying to remove resident from facility under false information. It is alleged facility staff have attempted to transfer resident #1 out of the facility under a false pretense. Interviews with 6 out of 10 residents revealed residents have been treated respectfully by staff and they are aware that if they have a change of condition, they will have to make different arrangements. 4 out of 10 residents were unable to be interviewed due to cognitive skills. Interviews with staff revealed residents are not asked to move out due to staff observation or residents’ behaviors. Per staff, residents are evaluated, and proper steps are taken. LPA was unable to interview resident #1 as the resident no longer resides in the facility. LPA was not able to review resident #1's file as the facility change management and files were surrender to corporate in 2024.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Regarding allegation: Resident is not accorded dignity in relationship with staff. It is alleged that resident #1 is being isolated by staff due to resident’s comments. Interviews conducted with residents revealed 8 out of 10 residents stated staff are respectful and treat residents accordingly. 2 out of 10 residents were unable to be interviewed due to cognitive skills.
(CONTINUED ON LIC 9099C) |