1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | For the allegation, Facility did not provide a refund upon resident’s death.
During staff interview, S1 indicated R1 had moved to the facility on 2/26/2024 had passed away on 2/29/2024. In addition, S1 indicated R1’s responsible party had made a payment of 4,500 and no reimbursement was provided. S1 indicated no copy of Admission Agreement and pre-admission were provided to R1’s family and R1 had moved their personal belongings on 2/29/2024.
During record review, LPA verify the facility had received a certified formal letter request on 9/9/2024 from R1’s authorized representative for R1’s records along with reimbursement. In addition, LPA verify the R1’s Admission Agreement was incomplete, the fee charges and refund conditions was missing.
Based on the evidence gathered during today’s investigation, the TWO (2) allegations listed above are deemed SUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaints are SUBSTANTIATED means that the allegation are valid because the preponderance of evidence the standard has been met.
During today’s visit, two (2) deficiency were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC9099) and LIC9099D was discussed and provided to Licensee Kristine A. Mangente along with a copy of the appeal rights.
|