1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | During the same visit, the LPA interviewed three staff members (S1-S3), all of whom denied the allegation, asserting that the facility regularly organized outings for clients in the community. The LPA also spoke with three clients (C2-C4), who likewise denied the claim, highlighting that they regularly left the facility to engage in activities such as visiting museums, going to the movies, and going to the beach.
Additionally, on March 19, 2026, the LPA reviewed a signed document dated March 2023 from the RP/C, which provided consent for the facility to take C1 out of the facility for community activities, including horseback riding. The LPA was unable to interview C1, as C1 had moved out of the facility on May 3, 2023. LPA attempted to contact the RP/C multiple times but was unsuccessful.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation (s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
No deficiencies were cited.
An Exit interview was conducted. A copy of the report was provided to the House Manager, Julie Baez
|