1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The first allegation is of facility did not ensure child’s personal belongings were safe guarded. As per the interviews conducted, the school age children are required to place their personal belongings when not in use back in their backpack. On the day of the incident as per staff observation, C1 left the chrome book on the classroom rug and was at the table doing other activities. After some time C1 returned to the rug to collect the chrome book during at which time C2 placed their knee on the chrome book which resulted in damaging the screen of the chrome book. As per staff, C1 had permitted C2 to use the chrome book while C1 was at the table taking part in other activities.
The second allegation is of the facility being out of ratio. The interviews revealed that the facility always maintains the school age ratio for the classrooms. As per the interviews the classroom does not exceed the ratio of 14 children to 1 staff in each classroom. Interviews with children did not reveal any out of ratio incidences. Also, depending on need, someone assists the teachers based on how busy they are. On initial visit, LPA observed 0 children and 1 staff in School Age Classroom 1 and 0 children and no staff in classroom 2. On subsequent visit conducted on this date, 05/16/24, LPA observed 12 children and 1 staff in School Age Classroom 1 and 12 children and 1 staff in classroom 2.
From the information received through interviews with Licensee and other pertaining parties, the above allegation cannot be verified. Although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the allegation did or did not occur, therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
An exit interview was conducted with Facility Director Theresa Salley, a Notice of Site Visit posted, and a copy of this report was provided to the facility on this date and time. |