1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | member's hand when the child fell and hit their head. The injury report was not signed by C1's guardian. Interviews conducted during the investigation revealed that video footage had been reviewed in relation to each reported injury. According to those interviewed, the footage did not show C1 sustaining the reported injuries while at the facility. The investigation also revealed that C1 has an older sibling. Staff reported that the siblings have a typical sibling relationship, which at times may involve behavior perceived as bullying toward C1.
Although the reported injuries did occur, the Department was unable to determine whether the injuries were sustained at the facility. The Director stated that all observed injuries are documented and communicated to both of C1's parents when discovered. Staff interviews further revealed that children occasionally sustain minor, age-appropriate injuries while in care; however, staff denied witnessing any unexplained, unusual, or concerning injuries involving C1. Based on the evidence obtained, there was insufficient evidence to determine that C1 sustained unexplained injuries while in care at the facility.
Regarding the allegation that staff violated a child’s personal rights, by using negative or inappropriate affirmations, specifically that staff would tell C1 on multiple occasions they were “ a bad boy” and stating the child needed to be ”fixed”. Interviews with staff denied hearing any teacher speak inappropriately or aggressively toward children. Staff consistently reported that they do not use negative affirmations, and the Director stated that staff do not provide negative language to children and may correct parental language when necessary.
Due to conflicting statements and the lack of corroborating evidence, that a child sustained unexplained injuries, staff violated a child’s personal rights by using negative or inappropriate affirmations, therefore, the allegations are deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur.
An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the report, appeal rights, and a Notice of Site Visit were provided to the Assistant Director. The Notice of Site Visit must remain posted for 30 consecutive days in a location clearly visible to families and caregivers. |