1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | According to the Licensee, the agreement was to watch the child 3 times a week, which included pick-up from school, but it was not a set schedule and services would be arranged by the parent days in advance. On 09/23/22, the Licensee’s phone went through a software update, and was unable to receive any messages or calls from anyone, including the parent until late that night and was unaware that the parent requested her services. The Licensee stated that she did not feel the need to call back since it was late on a Friday night and there was no prior arrangement to pick up the child that day.
The second allegation is Licensee did not communicate with authorized representative. During the investigation, Licensee stated that since her phone was updating, she did not receive any messages from the Parent. Licensee only received the messages at night and did not think it was urgent to call the Parent back at night. Licensee stated the Parent never contacted Licensee back.
From the information received by interviews with pertaining Parties the above allegations cannot be verified. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the allegations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
There are no deficiencies at this time.
An exit interview was conducted, and this report was reviewed with the licensee Norma Lopez. Appeal rights were discussed and provided during the exit interview.
A notice of site visit was given and Licensee understands it must remain posted for 30 days. |