1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Licensee reported to C1’s parent that C1 had a rash upon pick up. Licensee also stated she would report any concerns to the parent at the end of the day. Licensee reported C1 was provided 3 meals and 2 snacks per day and that C1 was a “good eater.” LPA interviewed staff 1 (S1) who assisted with cooking and caring for the children. S1 reported C1 would eat their food, but was not aware of diaper rashes as the Licensee would change the children. Additionally, 2 out of 2 confidential witnesses were interviewed and denied having any concerns regarding the statements alleged. Due to the age of the children, productive interviews were unable to be obtained.
Based on observations, facility records, and interviews with Licensee, S1, and confidential witnesses, there is not enough evidence to support the allegations that the Licensee is not meeting infants diapering needs and the Licensee is not providing adequate food to infant. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore, the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time.
A notice of site visit was given to Licensee Maria Zamora and must remain posted on, or immediately adjacent to, the interior side of the main door for 30 days. Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of $100. Exit interview was conducted and the report was reviewed with Licensee Maria Zamora. Appeal rights were discussed and provided during the exit interview. |