1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The first allegation is that Staff do not prevent daycare child from sustaining injuries. As per facility records and interviews, it was revealed that C1 has sustained injuries while at the facility on 2 different occasions. The first one occurred on August 16th, 2023, when C1 was running in the playroom area and jumped off the couch and bumped their head on the floor. The second incident happened on February 6, 2023, when C1 was running in the playroom area and bumped their forehead near the eyebrow on the bottom part of the slide. According to interviews, both incidents happened during playtime and were observed by the staff but were unable to prevent it from happening even after providing redirection and advising the children to stop running. Further interviews revealed that the children, including C1, were constantly told to stop running but were unable to prevent C1 from getting hurt because the incidents happened so quickly that staff were unable to prevent it. Staff confirmed that C1 was provided first aid and parents were notified via text immediately after the incidents.
The second allegation is Staff do not properly supervise day care child. Pertinent interviews were conducted with staff and children but was unable to corroborate allegation. As per the interviews, LPA confirmed that there is one staff always supervising children in the playroom area. The licensee stated the children enrolled at the facility are very active and facility staff is continuously redirecting them and trying to calm them down. LPA confirmed that staff were present and observed both incidents where C1 got hurt but denied that it happened due to a lack of supervision.
The third allegation is Licensee operates the facility of ratio. During the initial visit conducted by LPA on 02/14/24, LPA observed that there were 3 staff and 12 children. On the subsequent visit conducted on 03/20/24, there were 2 staff and 12 children present. As per the interviews, the facility ensures that they do not exceed the capacity limits as stated on the license. In addition, the licensee denied allegations and stated that she usually has 2 assistants during the day-care hours of operation.
From the information received through interviews with staff, and facility documents the above allegations cannot be verified. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the allegations did or did not occur, therefore, the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Ms. Samantha Roark, a Notice of Site Visit posted, and a copy of this report was provided to the facility on this date and time. |