1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA made an attempt to interview the only witness that observed the child run out of the facility but was unable to make contact and therefore was unable to collect pertinent details and/or information regarding the allegation. Therefore, the allegation that staff did not provide adequate supervision to a daycare child while in care is unsubstantiated.
It was alleged, that the Staff did not abide to admission agreement, specifically in regards to attendance, and the parent was informed that C1 could not attend the daycare unless a therapist was present. During investigation, LPA conducted a review of C1’s file and admission agreement. Based on record review, LPA could not confirm that there was any type of agreement and/or requirement by the daycare that indicated the child needed a therapist to be present during daycare. LPA noted that there was an aide (therapist) assigned to the child, but the aide’s services were discontinued by their employer and did not come back to the daycare. LPA noted that the child was still allowed to attend the daycare, however, the parent removed the child from the daycare shortly thereafter. In addition, LPA Shaw conducted pertinent interviews with all parties involved and could not corroborate allegation that C1 could not attend the daycare unless a therapist was present.
Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the allegations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
An exit interview was conducted with Director Greta Waldon , a Notice of Site Visit posted, and a copy of this report was provided to the facility on this date and time.
The Director Greta Waldon understands the Notice of Site Visit must be posted for 30 days. |