1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding the allegation that staff do not ensure a child’s diapering needs are met, confidential interviews revealed that there have been no parent complaints regarding children being left in soiled diapers. Interviews also disclosed that there was a recent staffing change related to diapering responsibilities, and since that change, no concerns have been reported. Although some interviews indicated that children have occasionally been observed in soiled diapers for an extended period, there is not a preponderance of evidence to determine whether the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, this allegation is also UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Based on the information obtained, there is insufficient evidence to prove that staff operated out of ratio or failed to meet children’s diapering needs. Although the allegations may have occurred or may be valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to support the alleged violations. The allegations are therefore deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED.
An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report, along with Appeal Rights, was provided. A Notice of Site Visit was issued, and the Licensee understands it must remain posted for 30 days. |