1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | present and awake, but child was unable to corroborate either side. C1 was unavailable for interview. LPA
interviewed another witness, who reported the same information as Licensee and that the turn over was not done in an aggressive manner.
Based on interviews conducted, the allegation that Provider handled day care child in a rough manner, may have happened or is valid, but there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time.
Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rights were discussed and provided to Licensee Nohemi Santana on this date.
A NOTICE OF SITE VISIT WAS ISSUED AND LPA VERIFIED THAT IT WAS POSTED IN A PROMINENT LOCATION AT THE FACILITY BEFORE LEAVING. THE LICENSEE UNDERSTANDS THAT IT MUST REMAIN POSTED FOR THE NEXT 30 DAYS
|