1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | 9099 continued...
As LPA Waters started the facility inspection, at approximately 1:15pm, LPA Waters observed one child (C1) remained awake but stayed on their cot with a blanket. LPA Waters did not observe any verbal or physical warnings to C1, nor did LPA Waters observe any assistance in falling asleep provided by staff. Approximately 10 minutes later, LPA observed that C1 was asleep. As the visit progressed, at approximately 2:25pm, LPA Waters witnessed 2 children awake and at the tables using play materials quietly while the remaining children slept. At approximately, 2:40pm, LPA Waters then witnessed 4 children get up from their cots, use the restroom and then return to their cots. The 4 children remained awake, but LPA did not witness any verbal reminders or physical touch to keep them on their cots. Interviews conducted confirmed the routines and procedures LPA Waters observed. Based on observations, and interviews, LPA Waters could not corroborate the allegation that children are forced to lay on cots for nap time.
Although the allegation listed above may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided along with copies of the Appeal Rights were provided.
A Notice of Site visit was given, and the Licensee understands that it must remain posted for 30 days. |