1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The Licensee stated that she did not see the child hurt herself at the day-care, nor did anyone witness the child have any type of accident. Regarding the allegation that the facility did not provide a safe environment for a day-care child, it was revealed that C1 was placed in a push car and a picture was sent to the parent; however, the parent did not want the child in the push car for safety reasons and requested the child to be removed. LPA confirmed that the incident occurred but was informed that the child was fastened properly and in direct supervision during the short period of time the child sat in the push car. In regard to the allegation that facility did not meet day-care child's needs, LPA conducted interviews and confirmed that the child was placed in a highchair for a short period of time, but was informed that the child was placed there so that the Licensee could serve lunch to the other children in care. According to the licensee, this was a common practice since she did not like to leave the children on the floor during meal time.
It was disclosed that certain items were left behind at the day-care once services were terminated. The items in question, were a bottle and a bib that remained in the child's cubby from the last day of attendance, which was on July 7th, and weren’t picked up until July 24th. LPA confirmed that the bottle was cleaned after use and both items were subsequently placed in the child’s cubby where it stayed there for approximately 17 days until the items were picked up by parents.
Based on the information obtained during this investigation, it has been determined that although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violations did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
An exit interview was conducted, and this report was reviewed with the Authorized Representative Marissa Santillan, and a copy was provided. Appeal rights were discussed and provided during the exit interview.
A Notice of Site visit was given, and Authorized Representative understands that it must remain posted for 30 days. |