1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The reason for the eviction did not meet the criteria for eviction as stated in Title 22 regulations. Additionally, the eviction letter did not identify available resources to assist the resident and/or family in finding alternative housing and the letter was not submitted to Licensing, as required. Thus, this allegation was Substantiated.
It was then alleged that Client #2 (C2) needed to be seen by a medical professional on 8/8/2023, and was not provided the opportunity to by the Licensee. LPA conducted interviews with clients, the Licensee, and conducted a record review of the facility's Program Design. Licensee interview revealed that C2 advised the Licensee that they were in a great amount of physical pain at approximately 9:00am. Licensee as well as clients confirmed that a hospital visit was not offered by the Licensee to C2, instead, Licensee stated that a tele-health appointment was made with C2's doctor on 8/9/2023 at 3:15pm for C2. Due to C2 voicing the need to be seen by a medical professional for their complaint of pain, and was denied the immediate care, this allegation was Substantiated.
Based on interviews and documents obtained, and reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met and the allegations are SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, is being cited on the attached LIC9099D.
An exit interview was conducted where a copy of this report, LIC811, LIC9099D, and appeal rights were discussed and provided to the Licensee.
|