1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Staff, who was present at the time of incident, stated that C1 was yelling at staff when C2 told C1 not to yell at staff like that. This triggered C1 to engage verbally and then attacked C2. Two staff intervened and were on both sides of C1, trying to redirect the clients. Staff also attempted to pull C1 off C2 but was unsuccessful until the 3rd attempt. During the physical altercation, C2 sustained injuries to the face, finger, and toe.
LPA Chan interviewed 3 Staff who stated that there are at least 2 staff per shift daily. Staff are always supervising the clients and will intervene right away if the clients engage in any altercations. C1 and C2 were also interviewed during the visit today. Clients stated staff are always present at the facility and monitoring them.
Based on the information gathered, staff are aware of clients’ behaviors and will intervene right away when there is an altercation. For this incident, Staff were present during the altercation and immediately intervened when C1 became physical. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur; therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
An exit interview was conducted with Staff R.Lawler. A copy of this report, along with the appeal rights, was provided. |