1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | At the time of LPA Colvin's visit to the facility, Administrator Shaffer still retained the original positing, which was shown to LPA Colvin. R2 was not present when the posting was removed and did not give consent for Shaffer to remove the posting. LPA Colvin reviewed the positing and observed that it was addressed to R2 only, and therefore was communication and property belonging to R2, and not the facility. Therefore, based on interviews conducted, the allegation "Staff confiscated resident's personal property" is SUBSTANTIATED.
A finding that the complaint is SUBSTANTIATED means that the allegation(s) is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met.
Due to observations made by LPA Colvin, the facility was cited, and deficiency was noted on LIC 9099 D. An exit interview was conducted where this report and appeal rights were discussed. A copy this report, LIC 9099D, and appeal rights were provided to Executive Director/Administrator Ernie Shaffer during the exit interview. |