1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA interviewed one (1) confidential witness who reported observing clients outside the facility with two (2) staff providing supervision; they reported no clients have been observed out of the facility without a staff.
LPA reviewed client’s IPP report which states that C1 requires constant supervision in all settings due to C1 displaying behaviors that can be a danger to themselves and to others when at home in the community; C1 typically AWOL’s to test the boundaries of staff.
Therefore, based on record review and interviews, the allegation Lack of supervision resulting in resident leaving the facility, is substantiated.
The preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore the above allegation is found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations Title 22, are being cited on the attached LIC 9099 D. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided. |