1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | For the allegation, Staff do not ensure appliances are working properly. During staff interviews, 3 out of the 3 staff stated appliances are working properly. During facility tour, LPA observed appliances to be working properly.
For the allegations, Staff are taking away residents’ personal property as punishment. During staff interviews, 3 out of the 3 staff stated they do not punish their residents and do not remove their personal items. During resident interviews 3 out of the 3 residents stated they have not been punished, and no personal item has been removed.
For the allegation, Staff are limiting tobacco use for residents. During staff interviews 3 out of the 3 staff stated they allow residents to smoke outside and do not limit their restrictions. During residents’ interviews 3 out of the 3 residents stated they do not like to smoke.
For the allegation, Staff are not criminally record cleared. During staff interviews, 3 out of the 3 staff stated they have a criminal record clearance. Based on record review LPA Rico verify all staff members associated to the facility have a criminal record clearance.
For the allegation, Staff do not ensure meals are of quantity to meet the needs of the residents. During staff interviews, 3 out of the 3 staff stated the facility has enough quantity of food available for residents. During residents’ interviews, 3 out of the residents stated the staff will provide more food when needed. During facility tour, LPA Rico observed the facility had enough food available for residents.
For the allegation, Staff do not allow residents to have visitors. During staff interviews, 3 out of the 3 staff stated residents are allowed to have visitors. During resident interviews, 3 out of the 3 residents stated they are allowed to have visits.
Based on the evidence found during the investigation, the eight (8) allegations listed above are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaints are UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. During today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations.
An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC9099) was discussed and provided to staff Rashad Bowie and a copy was also emailed to Administrator Charisse McCoy.
|