1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The second allegation indicates resident sustained an injury while in care. Interview with S2 stated R1 had a unwitnessed fall that results in R1 obtaining an hematoma injury to the right of their face. LPAs reviewed SIR regarding injury and verified report stated fall was unwitnessed and R1 informed staff they had fallen and hit their head when confronted by staff.
The third allegation indicates staff demonstrated inappropriate form of punishment towards a resident while in care. Interviews with staff indicated they have never witnessed R1 being punished while in care. S2 stated R1 was transferred to Memory Care Unit due to progression in dementia and not as a form of punishment. LPAs reviewed R1's physician report and verified R1 is diagnosed with dementia.
The fourth allegation indicated staff failed to protect residents from harm while care. Interviews with staff indicated the facility has never failed in protecting residents from harm. S1 and S2 stated R1 was never assaulted nor sustained any injuries while in Memory Care Unit.
Based on interviews which were conducted, and records review, the above allegations are unsubstantiated. A finding of UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur.
No deficiencies were cited at this time.
An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was reviewed and provided to the Executive Director
|