1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Document review of the facilities visitor log revealed that an Ombudsman representative visited the facility in May of 2021, as well as more recently visited the facility in December of 2022.
For allegation, Facility denied Ombudsman access to resident's records:
Interviews with the staff revealed an Ombudsman representative visited the facility in May of 2021. During this visit, the Ombudsman representative requested to view a residents medical file without stating the reason. The administrator asked the Ombudsman representative to explain the reason they needed to view the resident’s file. The Ombudsman representative denied that they needed a reason to view the resident’s medical file. The administrator informed the Ombudsman representative that they could not access the resident’s medical files. The administrator stated they denied the Ombudsman representative access to the resident's medical files because the Ombudsman representative did not obtain written consent from the resident or the residents legal representative.
Overall, there was not enough evidence to collaborate the allegations listed above.
Based on evidence obtained during the investigation, the two (2) allegations listed above are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaints are UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur.
During today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations.
An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC9099) was discussed and provided to Administrator Michelle Matamoros, along with a copy of the appeal rights. |