1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | During interviews with staff, LPA found two (2) staff that worked at the facility prior to the new ownership and name change of the facility. The two (2) staff both stated that during December of 2020, they felt overworked due to losing staffing during the COVID pandemic. The two (2) staff stated they would often work double shifts to ensure the safety of the residents in care.
During interviews with residents, LPA did not find any residents that had information about the staffing in 2020. The current residents did not have issues with the staffing levels at the facility.
During document review, LPA was unable to review a staffing schedule for the month of December 2020. The new facility does not have access to the old facilities staffing schedules.
Based on the evidence found during the investigation, the allegation listed above is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur.
During today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations.
An exit interview was conducted, and this report was discussed and provided to Executive Director Brian Taube, along with a copy of the appeal rights. |