1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | For allegation, Staff are not providing residents with food of good quality:
LPAs interviewed nine (9) residents and five (5) staff. During interviews conducted with residents, LPAs found that nine (9) out nine (9) residents stated the food served at the facility is good quality. During interviews conducted with facility staff, LPAs found that five (5) out of five (5) staff stated the food served at the facility is good quality. The residents are served breakfast, lunch, dinner, and snacks throughout the day. The residents are served protein, fruit, and vegetables. LPAs were provided a copy of the weekly menu showing the planned meal options. LPAs were not given information to collaborate the above allegation.
Based on the information found and provided, the allegations listed above are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED.
A finding that the complaint is UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations listed are deemed unsubstantiated.
During today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations.
An exit interview was conducted, and this report was discussed and provided to Health Services Director Alexis Brown, along with a copy of the appeal rights. |