1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | For the allegation, Resident in care is not provided a reasonable level of personal privacy.
During resident interviews, 8 out of the 8 residents informed LPA personal privacy is being provide. 5 out of the 8 residents also stated that staff members knock before entering their rooms and and will not enter without their permission.
During staff interviews. 6 out of the 6 staff informed LPA they provide privacy to all their residents. 3 out of the 6 staff informed LPA they will not enter a resident room unless they are authorized. 2 out of the 6 staff informed LPA R1 has signs outside their bedroom to not enter. In addition, 5 out of the 6 stated that R1 is forgetful when they drink and will accuse staff members entering their room without permission.
Based on the evidence found during the investigation, the two (2) allegations listed above are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaints are UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur.
During today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations.
An exit interview was conducted, and this report was discussed and provided to Sales Director Chad Ormsby along with a copy of the appeal rights.
|