1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding allegation, "Staff did not provide adequate supervision resulting in resident wandering away from facility." It was alleged that R1 left the facility and was found hitchhiking after wandering away from the facility. Document review revealed that R1 does not have wandering behaviors, and is relatively independent. After interview, R1 stated that they enjoy regular walks to keep good exercise. R1 expressed Therefore, this allegation was UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Regarding the allegation, "Unlawful Eviction." It was alleged that R1 had received an eviction on 12/20/2022 with an order to evict the premise. Interviews with S1 and R1 revealed that on 12/20/2022, R1 desired to leave on their own and went to sign out of the facility. S1 engaged R1 in conversation. During the verbal exchange, S1 told R1 that R1 was at "risk" of being evicted due to non-payment of rent for 3 consecutive months. R1 took the encounter as an eviction. An official eviction was never generated nor provided to R1. Due to conflicting accounts of the incident, coupled with the fact that there was no official eviction generated, this allegation was UNSUBSTANTIATED.
A finding of UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur.
An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report along with LIC9099-C, and LIC811- Confidential Names List was provided. |